Intro to Pub. Health Student Blog-Virginia Rogers
Friday, April 27, 2012
Key Determinants Impacting Water Supply Issues in El Salvador
Friday, April 20, 2012
Surveillance
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Public Health Problem
“Grab the test kit for me, Ginny.”
My eyes scanned the river’s water, looking for any visible signs of distress. Something must be wrong with the murky water, since my mother had brought me here. But, the water reflected the sky and continued to flow – what could possibly be wrong? On this particular warm summer day years ago, my mother, an environmental scientist, took me out into the field with her. She was studying the effect that a local New Jersey animal farm had on the water quality of the stream that passed through it. Sure enough, the results suggested that the dissolved oxygen, phosphate, and algae levels at the site were impacted by the farm.
Human activity has put a strain on natural resources, and the scary part is that sometimes the problems, such as increased pathogenicity or toxicity in water, are not visible to the naked eye. For this assignment, we are asked to identify a public health problem that is of particular interest to us. For our final paper, I hope to explore the issues surrounding water resource management in El Salvador, a water-stressed nation infamous for its largely contaminated water supply. A combination of climate change, human activity, and lack of interventions has contributed to the problem and to the local health issues that arise as a result. A 2011 governmental study found that only two percent of the nation’s rivers contain water that is fit for human use, regardless of whether the use is for direct consumption, agricultural, or recreational activities. As an offshoot of this, I would also like to compare the efficacy of intervention strategies: small water resource enterprises versus large water corporations in their ability to provide access to clean drinking water for the nation’s vulnerable populations.
Contaminated water has a huge social and economic impact on a global scale, and is an issue that is growing due to stresses on the vital resource and population growth. Diarrhea as a result of polluted water is the number one killer of children worldwide, and productive work days lost from illness and health costs associated with inadequate access to clean water puts an incalculable amount of stress on economic structures. If we continue with business as usual, it has been estimated by the Pacific Institute of Research that 135 million will die by 2020 as a result of contaminated water. Keeping this in mind, a case study of El Salvador's water issues and an analysis of possible interventions could provide insight into the global problem. All that is left is to refine and continue to specify the problem definition so that I may begin researching the subject.
Friday, April 6, 2012
Human Rights
"True peace is not merely the absence of tension, it is the presence of justice" is a quote by Martin Luther King Jr., and quite relevant in the discussion of human rights. For this week’s assignment, we explored the United Nations’ Declaration of Human Rights and the topic of maternal mortality as it relates to the human right to receive health care. A human right is an intrinsic right that should be internationally recognized, and according to the Declaration this common recognition “of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.” I would have to agree, given the many historic examples that disregard for such rights has left only oppression, suffering, and misery. Therefore, adhering (or not adhering) to these principles has huge implications for the health and general welfare of populations worldwide.
Article 25 of the Declaration states that “everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family…”, and the statement goes so far as to include housing, medical care, social services, and the right to financial security for those in need. This also explicitly extends to mothers and children. A good standard of living is vital in many ways to a healthy, productive life; it is surprising, though, that it would be considered an essential human right given how many nations do not provide such comprehensive care and security to all – not even close, including in America, where almost 50 million people are uninsured and some nations where millions are stuck in slums or in rural poverty. It is difficult, almost economically impossible given the current systems, to provide 7 billion with this “essential human right”. It is indeed important for health, but is most definitely hard to tackle.
The editorial we read outlined a Brazilian human rights case, Alyne da Silva Pimentel vs Brazil, that involved the death of a pregnant woman due to inadequate medical care services from the local facility. This case set the precedent that states must provide women with obstetric care and other necessary health services indiscriminately, in a timely and well-regulated manner. Also, governments that allow private health care must ensure that such humane treatment is being put into practice in the private arena.
In Article 25 of the Declaration, there is the statement that “motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance” and social protection. Such an idea of protecting mothers and would-be-mothers is widespread and internationally understood because mothers bear and, most often, foster the next generation of people – children are our future. Also, innocent children and unborn babies deserve their own set of rights regardless of what their mother’s background is – and the first of these natural, intrinsic rights is the right of life.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Contagion
Contagion was released in 2011, and its popularity fed off of growing fears that a highly infectious disease might rage through the human population, given how globalized the world has become. It showed how the disease was transmitted, from bat to pig to human, and its travel through the population via topical transmission. An interesting aspect was the response by public health agencies, which the movie focused on a great deal. From a public health perspective, the movie accurately showed this range of and how easily a disease with a short incubation period and high rate of transmission can spread through the world. It began with the first victim and the cinematography effectively accentuated where people touched and coughed on. Also, it showed the amalgam of organizations involved in responding to the crisis – scientists, police, emergency medical technicians, political figures, pharmaceuticals, investigative epidemiologists, the media, and regular laypeople. Essentially, it leaves us with the feeling that no one is protected (well, expect for the people that may be immune, like Matt Damon’s character Mitch Emhoff).
An outbreak occurs when an illness is occurring at a higher rate than it would on average in a certain area, and an outbreak investigation is a series of steps taken to establish the presence of the outbreak, hypothesize about it, understand the outbreak, and hopefully through this increase in knowledge lessens the future severity of it. It is quite scientifically structured. Isolation and quarantine, while they sound like synonyms, actually are different measures taken to control an outbreak. Isolation is used to separate ill people from those who are healthy, while quarantine is used to restrict the movement of people who may have been exposed to a disease to see if they become ill. These concepts were put into play in the movie when authorities were attempting to indentify and control the disease. There were mentions in the news portions of “clusters of outbreaks” which eventually spread and the outbreak investigation in the movie attempted to identify the initial hosts, create a vaccine, and lessen the rate of transmission through campaigns and other measures. Isolation occurred with the road block that the military set up to prevent people from crossing state lines and entering Wisconsin, as well as within homes to prevent transmission. And Emhoff was quarantined in the hospital after his wife and step-son died of the illness, but he was found to be immune.
I would hope that agencies should be better prepared for the response to the looting and lawlessness that took place after the disease began to ravage the world. I understand mass rioting is hard to control, and it is a scary thought that is difficult find a solution to, but that modern response systems would hopefully be better. I read a novel about the yellow fever epidemic in Philadelphia, and the scenes of anarchy reminded me of the way an 18th century outbreak was described. A more modern approach to such issues would definitely need to be devised.
Also, during the epidemic in the movie, the food distribution was greatly lacking. It is rare that food would need to be distributed on a large scale in the United States, and it is interesting and disconcerting to imagine what kind of a plan is in place if that needed to occur. But in the movie, the agencies were constantly running out of supplies, and the fact that people were left to fend for themselves so much seems hard to believe. Scary to imagine!
Friday, March 16, 2012
Climate Change
Quite often, the scope of coverage about climate change focuses solely on environmental changes. Truth is, the changes are just as detrimental to humans as they are to nature. For this week’s blog assignment, we were asked to address the health effects of climate change. Reading the American Journal of Public Health’s “Climate Change: The Public Health Response” offered insight into the topic. Two health affects that may influence the health of my family and friends would be “winter weather anomalies” and “increased ozone and pollen formation” because these changes could impede on our everyday lives. Slips and falls, as well as motor vehicle accidents, due to ice, snow, and rain affect any population group. And, increased pollination would increase allergy and asthma prevalence, which is something may people I know suffer from. Of the health effects on the list, the one that particularly surprised me was the increase in pollen production. The others are extreme weather changes and have been stressed before by many agencies, but I had yet to hear about the effect that climate change will have on allergies and asthma. Now that I think about it, it makes sense, but I had not previously considered it as a risk.
Primary prevention, attempting to lessen the change at hand, involves mitigation. In the case of climate change, the word includes efforts that have been made to reduce our GHG emissions and resource consumption. This will hopefully help prevent, or at least lessen, some effects that climate change will have on populations because the environmental changes will be reduced. Meanwhile, adaptation falls under the secondary and tertiary prevention efforts. It involves efforts to respond to and prepare for the health burdens associated with climate change. This is the response and treatment side rather than the preventative side, incorporating “public health preparedness”.
Public health professionals are an integral part of helping populations adapt to climate change. One specific example of providing a public health service related to the environmental and climate changes going on as a result of human impact would be working with media outlets to dispel any rumors or doubts about climate change, advertising possible effects, and suggesting behavior changes to both lessen environmental impact and health risks. This would be a part of both mitigation and adaptation techniques associated with “informing, educating, and empowering people about health issues.”
My hometown, Princeton, New Jersey, is home to a world-renowned university that is conducting research on climate change and its effect on the human population. Unfortunately, it does not disseminate into the town. I feel as though there is a general sentiment that the effects as so gradual – what does one or two degrees matter? – that they do not need to be addressed. Any small changes have potentially extreme results, while it may not be directly noticeable in my own town. Meanwhile, while Princeton is not necessarily preparing for climate change, they are prepared for emergency response, as should any town that runs smoothly. However, the underlying cause – climate change – still needs to be addressed so that its effects may be turned around. I could spectate a town hall meeting and work to get the issue on the council’s agenda or rally through more of a grass-roots advocacy approach. However, I remain pessimistic that the public will view climate change’s effect on health as a time-sensitive and urgent topic.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Public Health Achievements of the Past Decade
The title of the CDC report, Ten Great Public Health Achievements --- United States, 2001—2010, explains its purpose quite clearly. It highlights the most noteworthy public health achievements that have occurred over the past decade. Reading the list, I see that many interventions I would have thought should be included were indeed incorporated. It is an accurate list, but it is interesting that many of these innovations are not exactly new ideas – for example, motor vehicle safety has been an advocated for and important problem for longer than just this decade. Rather, pressure on such issues had lead to vast further improvements. Therefore, these achievements are not completely accomplished – as long as there are still existing cases, further changes can be made to improve effectiveness and extend lives even more.
The first achievement that particularly resonated with me is the improvement in “public health preparedness and response.” Public Health entities have definitely improved their preparedness and responsiveness over the past decade given the terrorism threats, natural disasters, and epidemics our country has faced. For example, the 2001 anthrax attacks, Hurricane Katrina, E. Coli outbreaks, and the H1N1 virus of the past ten years had really struck a chord with the American public and its policy makers. I remember the fear surrounding all of these events, and am happy that improvements have been made in preparedness to lessen the effects of such situations on the health of populations.
Secondly, the “childhood lead poisoning prevention” achievement resonates with me because lead poisoning is something that has plagued the Baltimore for a very long time, and it particularly affects “black children and those living in poverty and in old, poorly maintained housing.” Last semester, I learned in a class entitled Baltimore & the Wire that there are many old row houses with lead paint and piping, and lead exposure causes possible brain damage in children. The city has been doing a good job of fixing up or knocking down old houses, as well as imposing building regulations to prevent such materials from being used in currently constructed houses. Nationwide, according the article, from 1976-1980 to 2003-2008 the percentage of children with blood lead levels greater than 10 µg/dL showed a declined from 88.2% to 0.9%. This is an amazing achievement that is especially relevant to the health of the city our University is located in, and affects the lives of many.
When the CDC publishes an article in 2020 highlighting the public health achievements of the past decade, I would like to see a significant decrease in the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains of existing diseases, for example tuberculosis. This can be accomplished by making sure that patients are treated completely for the illness and complete their treatment regimen rather than stopping treatment because the symptoms diminish. Not only does the disease have a possibility of surging up again, but it has a high chance of being resistant to the antibiotics that were used to treat it the first time. Also, quarantining such a patient is a must. Antibiotics are not being developed fast enough to cope with the increases in antibiotic-resistant diseases. Some officials fear a future epidemic of mutated diseases that are antibiotic-resistant, and this fear can be dissolved by increasing pressure to improve the administration of, and cut down on the abuse of, antibiotics.