Friday, April 27, 2012
Key Determinants Impacting Water Supply Issues in El Salvador
Friday, April 20, 2012
Surveillance
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Public Health Problem
“Grab the test kit for me, Ginny.”
My eyes scanned the river’s water, looking for any visible signs of distress. Something must be wrong with the murky water, since my mother had brought me here. But, the water reflected the sky and continued to flow – what could possibly be wrong? On this particular warm summer day years ago, my mother, an environmental scientist, took me out into the field with her. She was studying the effect that a local New Jersey animal farm had on the water quality of the stream that passed through it. Sure enough, the results suggested that the dissolved oxygen, phosphate, and algae levels at the site were impacted by the farm.
Human activity has put a strain on natural resources, and the scary part is that sometimes the problems, such as increased pathogenicity or toxicity in water, are not visible to the naked eye. For this assignment, we are asked to identify a public health problem that is of particular interest to us. For our final paper, I hope to explore the issues surrounding water resource management in El Salvador, a water-stressed nation infamous for its largely contaminated water supply. A combination of climate change, human activity, and lack of interventions has contributed to the problem and to the local health issues that arise as a result. A 2011 governmental study found that only two percent of the nation’s rivers contain water that is fit for human use, regardless of whether the use is for direct consumption, agricultural, or recreational activities. As an offshoot of this, I would also like to compare the efficacy of intervention strategies: small water resource enterprises versus large water corporations in their ability to provide access to clean drinking water for the nation’s vulnerable populations.
Contaminated water has a huge social and economic impact on a global scale, and is an issue that is growing due to stresses on the vital resource and population growth. Diarrhea as a result of polluted water is the number one killer of children worldwide, and productive work days lost from illness and health costs associated with inadequate access to clean water puts an incalculable amount of stress on economic structures. If we continue with business as usual, it has been estimated by the Pacific Institute of Research that 135 million will die by 2020 as a result of contaminated water. Keeping this in mind, a case study of El Salvador's water issues and an analysis of possible interventions could provide insight into the global problem. All that is left is to refine and continue to specify the problem definition so that I may begin researching the subject.
Friday, April 6, 2012
Human Rights
"True peace is not merely the absence of tension, it is the presence of justice" is a quote by Martin Luther King Jr., and quite relevant in the discussion of human rights. For this week’s assignment, we explored the United Nations’ Declaration of Human Rights and the topic of maternal mortality as it relates to the human right to receive health care. A human right is an intrinsic right that should be internationally recognized, and according to the Declaration this common recognition “of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.” I would have to agree, given the many historic examples that disregard for such rights has left only oppression, suffering, and misery. Therefore, adhering (or not adhering) to these principles has huge implications for the health and general welfare of populations worldwide.
Article 25 of the Declaration states that “everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family…”, and the statement goes so far as to include housing, medical care, social services, and the right to financial security for those in need. This also explicitly extends to mothers and children. A good standard of living is vital in many ways to a healthy, productive life; it is surprising, though, that it would be considered an essential human right given how many nations do not provide such comprehensive care and security to all – not even close, including in America, where almost 50 million people are uninsured and some nations where millions are stuck in slums or in rural poverty. It is difficult, almost economically impossible given the current systems, to provide 7 billion with this “essential human right”. It is indeed important for health, but is most definitely hard to tackle.
The editorial we read outlined a Brazilian human rights case, Alyne da Silva Pimentel vs Brazil, that involved the death of a pregnant woman due to inadequate medical care services from the local facility. This case set the precedent that states must provide women with obstetric care and other necessary health services indiscriminately, in a timely and well-regulated manner. Also, governments that allow private health care must ensure that such humane treatment is being put into practice in the private arena.
In Article 25 of the Declaration, there is the statement that “motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance” and social protection. Such an idea of protecting mothers and would-be-mothers is widespread and internationally understood because mothers bear and, most often, foster the next generation of people – children are our future. Also, innocent children and unborn babies deserve their own set of rights regardless of what their mother’s background is – and the first of these natural, intrinsic rights is the right of life.